Market InstituteMarket Institute
  • About
    • Who We Are
  • Research & Commentary
    • Papers
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects
    • International Overreach: When Global Standards Become U.S. Policy
    • Alzheimer’s
    • Letters
    • Political Cartoons

Letters

  • Market Institute Joins Coalition Backing USTRx Act to End Foreign Drug FreeloadingJuly 22, 2026
    The Market Institute has joined the Center for a Free Economy and more than three dozen national organizations in urging Congress to pass the USTRx Act (H.R. 4780), legislation that would help end the unfair practice of foreign governments shifting the cost of pharmaceutical innovation onto American patients. In a… Read more: Market Institute Joins Coalition Backing USTRx Act to End Foreign Drug Freeloading
  • Market Institute and Center for a Free Economy Lead Coalition Letter Supporting the “More Homes on the Market Act”March 4, 2026
    The Market Institute and the Center for a Free Economy (CFE) led a coalition of free-market leaders and organizations urging congressional leadership to pass the More Homes on the Market Act (H.R. 1340 / S. 3332)—a bipartisan reform designed to increase housing supply and improve affordability for American families. In… Read more: Market Institute and Center for a Free Economy Lead Coalition Letter Supporting the “More Homes on the Market Act”
  • Market Institute Joins Coalition Opposing Most-Favored-Nation Drug PricingFebruary 12, 2026
    The Market Institute joined dozens of free-market, taxpayer, and innovation-focused organizations in a February 12 coalition letter to Congress opposing efforts to codify a Most-Favored-Nation (MFN) prescription drug pricing model into law. In the letter, the coalition warned that MFN would not solve the real problem of foreign price controls.… Read more: Market Institute Joins Coalition Opposing Most-Favored-Nation Drug Pricing
  • The Market Institute Joins Coalition Supporting Advanced Recycling InnovationJanuary 27, 2026
    The Market Institute is proud to have signed onto a coalition letter supporting the Recycling Technology Innovation Act (H.R. 6566), bipartisan legislation that would provide regulatory certainty for advanced recycling technologies and bring federal policy in line with market realities. Advanced recycling plays an increasingly important role in modern manufacturing… Read more: The Market Institute Joins Coalition Supporting Advanced Recycling Innovation
  • Market Institute Joins Coalition Supporting Gov. Kehoe’s Missouri PromiseJanuary 6, 2026
    The Market Institute has joined a broad coalition of national and state-based organizations urging the Missouri General Assembly to support Governor Mike Kehoe’s Missouri Promise—a responsible, trigger-based plan to phase out the state individual income tax and modernize Missouri’s outdated tax system. Missouri-Letter Missouri’s current income tax structure dates back… Read more: Market Institute Joins Coalition Supporting Gov. Kehoe’s Missouri Promise
  • $40 Billion in Savings, Less Government Waste: Why House Republicans Should Add Site NeutralityDecember 15, 2025
    House Republicans are searching for ways to advance conservative health care reform while securing the votes needed to pass their package. There is already a solution on the table—one that delivers real savings without expanding government control. In a letter to House leadership, Market Institute President Charles Sauer urged Congress… Read more: $40 Billion in Savings, Less Government Waste: Why House Republicans Should Add Site Neutrality
  • Site Neutrality: A Key Reform to Cut Costs and Strengthen CompetitionDecember 12, 2025
    As Congress debates its next major healthcare package, one reform stands out for its ability to lower costs, strengthen competition, and protect patient choice: Site Neutrality. Today, federal policy pays hospital-owned facilities far more than independent physicians for the exact same service—a distortion that fuels consolidation, drives up prices, and… Read more: Site Neutrality: A Key Reform to Cut Costs and Strengthen Competition
  • Coalition to Congress: Pass the SCORE Act and Protect Student-Athletes from OverreachDecember 3, 2025
    A broad coalition of free-market, taxpayer-advocacy, and constitutional-rights organizations—including The Market Institute—sent a letter to Speaker Mike Johnson urging swift passage of H.R. 4312, the Student Compensation and Opportunity through Rights and Endorsements (SCORE) Act. SCORE Act Letter – 12.1.25 At its core, the SCORE Act restores sanity to the… Read more: Coalition to Congress: Pass the SCORE Act and Protect Student-Athletes from Overreach
  • Market Institute Joins Free-Market Coalition Urging Approval of UP–NS MergerOctober 9, 2025
    The Market Institute has joined a coalition of free-market and pro-growth organizations in urging the Surface Transportation Board (STB) to approve the proposed merger between Union Pacific (UP) and Norfolk Southern (NS). In a letter sent to the Board, the coalition emphasized that the merger represents a major investment in… Read more: Market Institute Joins Free-Market Coalition Urging Approval of UP–NS Merger
  • Market Institute Joins Coalition Urging FCC to Respect Free-Market Broadcast NegotiationsSeptember 9, 2025
    The Market Institute joined a coalition of free-market and pro-innovation organizations in urging Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Brendan Carr to avoid intervening in private contract negotiations between broadcast networks and affiliates. The letter commends Chairman Carr’s deregulatory leadership, particularly his efforts to modernize outdated ownership caps and remove rules… Read more: Market Institute Joins Coalition Urging FCC to Respect Free-Market Broadcast Negotiations

Loading

By adding your phone number, you opt in to receive text messages

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube

The Market Institute Verified account Follow

We promote free market public policies. We get government out of the way.

MarketInstitute
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Businesses should be able to succeed or fail based on how they perform, not how much the government has invested in them. A free market means letting businesses compete on their own, not having the government take a bigger seat at the table.

Stephen Moore @StephenMoore

Memo to the Trump administration: Stop buying companies.

A government $40 trillion in debt should be SELLING assets, not buying ownership stakes in 36 companies.

We thought government control of the means of production was what we were fighting against.

Reply on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Retweet on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Like on Twitter 2113667268819182035 X 2113667268819182035
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

The goal should be simple: protect national security without blocking promising medicines from reaching American patients.

Broad biotech restrictions risk doing exactly that.

Axios @axios

Trump administration proposes new curbs on China biotech deals https://www.axios.com/2026/10/23/trump-china-biotech-restrictions?utm_campaign=mrf-utm_source=x&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&mrfcid=202610236ad04fc1adeaa64e72130b68

Reply on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Retweet on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Like on Twitter 2113627990798049521 X 2113627990798049521
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Protecting inventors is a founding American principle. Strong patent rights give innovators the incentive to build what comes next.

As @newtgingrich puts it:

“We want to encourage inventors. We want to give them legal protection so they have an incentive.”

Reply on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Retweet on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Like on Twitter 2113626326032928990 X 2113626326032928990

  • About
  • Research & Commentary
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects