The Market Institute President Charles Sauer has a new article in the Washington Examiner’s Restoring America series looking at why Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) is ending his tenure in the Senate with a patent bill that will harm inventors.

“The 47-year-serving Democratic senator from Vermont, Patrick Leahy, is finishing his marathon tenure with a patent reform bill.

It should be called “The America Hates Inventors Act.” The problem for inventors is that Congress and the Biden administration are dealing with a floundering economy. That puts pressure on them to do something — and innovators are a minority that politicians enjoy attacking. Unfortunately, while Congress can brag about changes to the patent system, the effects of running over inventor rights won’t show up in the economy for several elections after the changes are made. That means legislators can make changes now, even if they might tank our nation’s economy in the future, and never pay the price.

It’s a recipe for public policy failure.

A hearing on the Leahy bill in early June turned into more political theater. Nevertheless, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) did rightly note a moral concern. As he put it, “I have some concerns when those rights which often amount to a person’s livelihood can be stripped away by unaccountable bureaucrats not elected or appointed by the president nor confirmed by Congress.”

Indeed. The problem with Leahy’s bill is that it makes the Patent Trial and Appeal Board even stronger than it currently is. The bill is “basically a wish list of patent-killers seeking to cancel patent rights via inter partes review,” according to the law blog Patently-O.

PTAB was created by the America Invents Act to be a cheaper and faster patent court, but because of a lack of rules and clear procedures, it has been panned by everyone except patent infringers since then. In one case, when the board didn’t rule in favor of the infringer, the director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office added other board members. When, again, the vote didn’t go her way, she added another member. Eventually the inventor’s patent was taken away.

Leahy’s bill would create more patent challenges, encourage multiple avenues of challenges, expand what the PTAB examines in patent challenges, and make this kangaroo court available to government agencies. The Leahy bill is objectively bad for a country that prides itself on innovation. But Leahy is retiring, and now, there is talk about adding this bad bill to the National Defense Authorization Act, which is a must-pass bill that Congress will consider very soon.

We need to be vigilant. A parting gift for a retiring senator should be a bottle of scotch — not a wish list for sabotaging the economy. There are so many better options available.”

Read the rest of this article by heading over to Washington Examiner.