Market InstituteMarket Institute
  • About
    • Who We Are
  • Research & Commentary
    • Papers
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects
    • International Overreach: When Global Standards Become U.S. Policy
    • Alzheimer’s
    • Letters
    • Political Cartoons

Patents

Articles Patents

The Pendulum Is Swinging Toward Innovation

After huddling in our caves for a year – the world is coming to life again. That will be good for the economy, it will be good for everyone’s mental health, but most importantly it will likely mean a boom in innovation. The problem is that until the Trump Administration Read more…

By admin, 5 years5 years ago
Letter Press Release

Small Inventor Letter Re: Leahy’s Restoring the America Invents Act

By admin, 5 years5 years ago
Articles Patents

Biden Should Respect Vaccine Makers’ Patent Rights

Market Institute President Charles Sauer has a new piece in RealClear Policy on patent rights. The White House recently issued a patent waiver for Covid-19 vaccines. Here’s an excerpt of Sauer’s article: “President Biden recently made what the Wall Street Journal referred to as the worst single Presidential decision since Nixon’s Read more…

By admin, 5 years3 years ago
Articles Patents

Trump’s presidency has had some redeeming qualities: Innovation was protected

Market Institute President Charles Sauer has a new article up at the Washington Examiner on how the United States Patent and Trademark Office has empowered innovation the last 4 years. President Trump’s legacy will be something that is debated for years to come, but his administration did have some redeeming Read more…

By admin, 6 years3 years ago
Articles

Trump enabled the vaccine moonshot, but his drug price rule threatens future innovation

The Market Institute President Charles Sauer has a new piece in the Washington Examiner looking at the White House’s newest proposed regulation on importing foreign prices controls for prescription drugs. Here is an excerpt: “On July 20, 1969, the United States landed on the moon. In November, a couple of Read more…

By admin, 6 years3 years ago
Articles

Republicans Push for Socialist Price Controls in Coronavirus Bill

The Market Institute’s Charles Sauer is out with a new Op-ed in the Washington Examiner looking at legislation on “Surprise Billing.” In the midst of intense negotiations on a phase 4 coronavirus relief bill, a debate is brewing over the inclusion of a ‘fix’ to the issue of surprise billing. Read more…

By Jeff Cargerman, 6 years3 years ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 2 3
Recent Articles
  • A Government That’s Trying to Please You Will Make You Miserable October 16, 2026
  • How I Stopped Worrying, and Learned to Love Data Centers October 15, 2026
  • Charles Sauer: Government Policy Is Fueling Hospital Consolidation October 13, 2026
  • Patients First Act: Protecting Choice and Taxpayers October 9, 2026
  • Most Favored Nation Price Controls Disfavor Patients October 5, 2026
Recent Papers
  • The Trouble with Tariffs
  • The $135 Billion Lie: How Upcoding Is Draining Medicare and Medicaid
  • Why Does the Government Pay More for the Same Care?
  • The Practical, Constitutional, and Moral Case Against Social Media Regulation “For the Children”
  • Free Markets Under Attack from the Left and Right

Loading

By adding your phone number, you opt in to receive text messages

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube

The Market Institute Verified account Follow

We promote free market public policies. We get government out of the way.

MarketInstitute
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Businesses should be able to succeed or fail based on how they perform, not how much the government has invested in them. A free market means letting businesses compete on their own, not having the government take a bigger seat at the table.

Stephen Moore @StephenMoore

Memo to the Trump administration: Stop buying companies.

A government $40 trillion in debt should be SELLING assets, not buying ownership stakes in 36 companies.

We thought government control of the means of production was what we were fighting against.

Reply on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Retweet on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Like on Twitter 2113667268819182035 X 2113667268819182035
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

The goal should be simple: protect national security without blocking promising medicines from reaching American patients.

Broad biotech restrictions risk doing exactly that.

Axios @axios

Trump administration proposes new curbs on China biotech deals https://www.axios.com/2026/10/23/trump-china-biotech-restrictions?utm_campaign=mrf-utm_source=x&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&mrfcid=202610236ad04fc1adeaa64e72130b68

Reply on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Retweet on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Like on Twitter 2113627990798049521 X 2113627990798049521
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Protecting inventors is a founding American principle. Strong patent rights give innovators the incentive to build what comes next.

As @newtgingrich puts it:

“We want to encourage inventors. We want to give them legal protection so they have an incentive.”

Reply on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Retweet on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Like on Twitter 2113626326032928990 X 2113626326032928990

  • About
  • Research & Commentary
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects