Market InstituteMarket Institute
  • About
    • Who We Are
  • Research & Commentary
    • Papers
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects
    • International Overreach: When Global Standards Become U.S. Policy
    • Alzheimer’s
    • Letters
    • Political Cartoons

Regulations

Articles

If Elected, Donald Trump Must Dismiss Lina Khan

As the 2024 election approaches, advisors to former President Trump are reportedly preparing plans to overhaul federal agencies they see as “woke” bureaucracies. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under Lina Khan is a top target. Market Institute President Charles Sauer explains in Real Clear Markets that Khan’s push for politically Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Treating Big Tech As Common Carriers Will Not Protect Free Speech

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to remand Moody v. NetChoice back to the lower courts has reignited the debate over whether social media companies should be treated as common carriers. At stake are fundamental questions about free speech, censorship, and the role of government in regulating online platforms. Proponents argue Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Lina Khan Spends Tax Dollars To Help EU Fine U.S. Companies

Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan has continuously pushed policies that threaten free markets and American prosperity. One of her most troubling actions is using taxpayer dollars to assist the European Union in implementing its Digital Markets Act (DMA), a regulatory scheme that targets U.S. tech companies like Amazon, Apple, Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices Could Change Attitudes on Vaccines

In his latest article for RealClear Health, Market Institute President Charles Sauer highlights the importance of preserving patient choice in healthcare. As the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) prepares to vote on lowering the age for routine pneumococcal vaccinations, Sauer argues that both FDA-approved vaccines should be recommended. Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Lina Khan and J.D. Vance Stand In the Way of Free Speech

Current antitrust actions led by figures like FTC Chair Lina Khan and Senator JD Vance threaten not only the success of these companies but also the fundamental freedoms they enable. Khan’s aggressive stance against Big Tech, particularly her push to break up or heavily regulate tech giants, reflects a disturbing Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Contra Lina Khan, ‘Serial Acquirers’ Help Small Compete With Big

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) under Lina Khan and the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division, led by Jonathan Kanter, are intensifying their focus on what they term “serial acquirers.” These are companies that grow by acquiring or merging with smaller businesses, often in the same industry. Khan and Kanter, as leading Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Don’t Let the Sun Go Down On Section 230, Expand It Instead

In the vast landscape of internet regulation, few laws have been as influential—or as controversial—as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. At the heart of this debate are 26 words that have shaped the digital age: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

The FTC Aims at Amazon, Hurts Small Businesses

In the world of e-commerce, few names resonate as strongly as Amazon. Starting from humble beginnings in a Seattle garage, Jeff Bezos transformed his online bookstore into the globe-spanning retail giant we know today. The secret behind Amazon’s success lies in its blend of competitive pricing, extensive product selection, and Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Lina Khan Is the Miley Cyrus of Regulatory Policy

In recent years, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has taken a notably aggressive stance on mergers and acquisitions under the leadership of Chair Lina Khan. This has sparked widespread debate and concern among various stakeholders in the business community. US Policy Editor Charles Sauer delves into the impact of Khan’s Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago
Articles

Lina Khan Seeks More Funding To Help Europe Regulate U.S. Companies

Public figures often use a tactic called the non-denial denial to avoid giving straight answers to tough questions. FTC Chair Lina Khan showcased this technique during her testimony before a House Appropriations Subcommittee, where she was questioned about the FTC’s aggressive antitrust policies and international collaborations. In his article, Market Read more…

By admin, 2 years2 years ago

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 7 8 9 … 15 Next
Recent Articles
  • A Government That’s Trying to Please You Will Make You Miserable October 16, 2026
  • How I Stopped Worrying, and Learned to Love Data Centers October 15, 2026
  • Charles Sauer: Government Policy Is Fueling Hospital Consolidation October 13, 2026
  • Patients First Act: Protecting Choice and Taxpayers October 9, 2026
  • Most Favored Nation Price Controls Disfavor Patients October 5, 2026
Recent Papers
  • The Trouble with Tariffs
  • The $135 Billion Lie: How Upcoding Is Draining Medicare and Medicaid
  • Why Does the Government Pay More for the Same Care?
  • The Practical, Constitutional, and Moral Case Against Social Media Regulation “For the Children”
  • Free Markets Under Attack from the Left and Right

Loading

By adding your phone number, you opt in to receive text messages

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube

The Market Institute Verified account Follow

We promote free market public policies. We get government out of the way.

MarketInstitute
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Businesses should be able to succeed or fail based on how they perform, not how much the government has invested in them. A free market means letting businesses compete on their own, not having the government take a bigger seat at the table.

Stephen Moore @StephenMoore

Memo to the Trump administration: Stop buying companies.

A government $40 trillion in debt should be SELLING assets, not buying ownership stakes in 36 companies.

We thought government control of the means of production was what we were fighting against.

Reply on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Retweet on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Like on Twitter 2113667268819182035 X 2113667268819182035
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

The goal should be simple: protect national security without blocking promising medicines from reaching American patients.

Broad biotech restrictions risk doing exactly that.

Axios @axios

Trump administration proposes new curbs on China biotech deals https://www.axios.com/2026/10/23/trump-china-biotech-restrictions?utm_campaign=mrf-utm_source=x&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&mrfcid=202610236ad04fc1adeaa64e72130b68

Reply on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Retweet on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Like on Twitter 2113627990798049521 X 2113627990798049521
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Protecting inventors is a founding American principle. Strong patent rights give innovators the incentive to build what comes next.

As @newtgingrich puts it:

“We want to encourage inventors. We want to give them legal protection so they have an incentive.”

Reply on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Retweet on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Like on Twitter 2113626326032928990 X 2113626326032928990

  • About
  • Research & Commentary
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects