Market InstituteMarket Institute
  • About
    • Who We Are
  • Research & Commentary
    • Papers
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects
    • International Overreach: When Global Standards Become U.S. Policy
    • Alzheimer’s
    • Letters
    • Political Cartoons

Tech

Articles

How I Stopped Worrying, and Learned to Love Data Centers

Opposition to data centers has become an increasingly bipartisan cause. But efforts to slow or block their development risk undermining the very innovation that can address concerns about energy costs, water use, and infrastructure. In a new commentary in RealClearMarkets, Market Institute Senior Fellow Norm Singleton explains that data centers Read more…

By admin, 1 week1 week ago
Articles

Big Tech Requires 1st Amendment Protection Like Everyone Else

In a recent column at RealClearMarkets, Market Institute President Charles Sauer highlights an important tension within the Trump Administration’s approach to regulation. While the administration has wisely pulled back from the overly aggressive antitrust enforcement of the Biden years, troubling moves at the FCC and FTC risk undermining the First Read more…

By admin, 1 year ago
Articles

Searching for Scapegoats For His Own Failings, Eric Adams Happens On ‘Social Media”

In a recent State of the City address, Mayor Eric Adams of New York City ignited controversy by labeling social media as a “public health crisis” for children. Market Institute President Charles Sauer, a staunch advocate for free markets and individual liberty, challenges this narrative in his latest article in Read more…

By admin, 3 years3 years ago
Articles

Calls To Ban Wildly Powerful TikTok Are Self-Contradictory

Debates surrounding TikTok’s ascent in the United States have sparked concerns over its potential to influence American culture and serve as a conduit for foreign influence, notably from China. Critics warn of an impending cultural shift, echoing fears of an “epidemic” driven by the platform’s widespread reach. However, a nuanced Read more…

By admin, 3 years3 years ago
Articles

A Lindsey Graham-Elizabeth Warren Commission: A Terrible Idea

Senators Elizabeth Warren and Lindsey Graham’s Digital Consumer Commission Act is a threat to free speech, granting excessive censorship powers under the guise of combating online harassment. The bill’s ban on preferencing assumes consumers are incapable of making informed choices, unfairly penalizing businesses for providing better services. This proposed legislation Read more…

By admin, 3 years3 years ago
Recent Articles
  • A Government That’s Trying to Please You Will Make You Miserable October 16, 2026
  • How I Stopped Worrying, and Learned to Love Data Centers October 15, 2026
  • Charles Sauer: Government Policy Is Fueling Hospital Consolidation October 13, 2026
  • Patients First Act: Protecting Choice and Taxpayers October 9, 2026
  • Most Favored Nation Price Controls Disfavor Patients October 5, 2026
Recent Papers
  • The Trouble with Tariffs
  • The $135 Billion Lie: How Upcoding Is Draining Medicare and Medicaid
  • Why Does the Government Pay More for the Same Care?
  • The Practical, Constitutional, and Moral Case Against Social Media Regulation “For the Children”
  • Free Markets Under Attack from the Left and Right

Loading

By adding your phone number, you opt in to receive text messages

Facebook
Twitter
YouTube

The Market Institute Verified account Follow

We promote free market public policies. We get government out of the way.

MarketInstitute
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Businesses should be able to succeed or fail based on how they perform, not how much the government has invested in them. A free market means letting businesses compete on their own, not having the government take a bigger seat at the table.

Stephen Moore @StephenMoore

Memo to the Trump administration: Stop buying companies.

A government $40 trillion in debt should be SELLING assets, not buying ownership stakes in 36 companies.

We thought government control of the means of production was what we were fighting against.

Reply on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Retweet on Twitter 2113667268819182035 Like on Twitter 2113667268819182035 X 2113667268819182035
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

The goal should be simple: protect national security without blocking promising medicines from reaching American patients.

Broad biotech restrictions risk doing exactly that.

Axios @axios

Trump administration proposes new curbs on China biotech deals https://www.axios.com/2026/10/23/trump-china-biotech-restrictions?utm_campaign=mrf-utm_source=x&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=editorial&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social&mrfcid=202610236ad04fc1adeaa64e72130b68

Reply on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Retweet on Twitter 2113627990798049521 Like on Twitter 2113627990798049521 X 2113627990798049521
marketinstitute

The Market Institute

Verified account @marketinstitute ·
23 Oct

Protecting inventors is a founding American principle. Strong patent rights give innovators the incentive to build what comes next.

As @newtgingrich puts it:

“We want to encourage inventors. We want to give them legal protection so they have an incentive.”

Reply on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Retweet on Twitter 2113626326032928990 Like on Twitter 2113626326032928990 X 2113626326032928990

  • About
  • Research & Commentary
  • Events
  • Issues
  • Projects